By Diane R. Rubin
An informal survey of lawyers at my firm indicates that a sizable percentage were history majors as
undergrads. That includes me. I was a U.S. history major at Brandeis
University, so when Peter Wittenborg suggested that a brief history of the Land
Court might be a topic of interest for my President’s message, I dove in.
Many of us can date ourselves by where the Land Court
was located when we first practiced there.
My first appearance was before Judge Scheier when the “old” Suffolk
County Courthouse was its home and had been so for decades, since 1911. At the time of my first appearance, there
were only four judges of the Land Court; today there are seven. In recent years, the Land Court has spent
time in both the Edward Brooke Courthouse at New Chardon Street (1999) and on
Causeway Street (2003), before settling into its current digs in the “new”
Suffolk County Courthouse in Pemberton Square (2010).
The real estate bar in Massachusetts has been a
long-time friend and supporter of the Land Court. REBA (and its predecessor the Massachusetts Conveyancers Association) and the
Abstract Club have collaborated with the Land Court to maintain standards of
excellence as our practices have evolved into the electronic age. I was reminded of this close relationship
when Peter Wittenborg shared with me a short history of the Abstract Club. This jam-packed booklet includes colorful
entries by the esteemed Charles Rackemann, William Payson and Mark Titlebaum,
dating from 1908, 1972 and 1986, respectively.
I would like to share a few excerpts.
In 1972, William Payson provided a prescient vision
when he cautioned that “Prophets of doom
from time to time remind us as to what the future holds for conveyancers. They envisage a time when almost no one will
be pushing a pen in the Registry of Deeds and when all that will be necessary
to obtain the pertinent facts respecting a title will be to a push a few buttons
. . . and the needed information will
pop out on a broad tape or tube.”
Mr. Payson did not regret this change but saw “a rosier and more
productive future,” where the task of conveyancers would be “limited to matters
of law, interpretation and draftsmanship.”
More than a decade later, Mark Titlebaum forecast that the principal issues
before the real estate bar would be those “dealing with the environment and
land use or dealing with financial instruments used in real estate
transactions.”
Both prognostications have turned out to be true. Our practices and the Land Court have grown
to address the real property concerns of our modern lives. In preparing this brief history, I relied on
and give thanks to A
Brief History of the Land Court, by Glendon J. Busher, Jr. as appearing on the Land Court’s website, as well
as the prodigious memory of Ed Smith, REBA’s sage long-time lobbyist.
A partner at Prince
Lobel Tye LLP and a founding chair of the Association’s condominium law and
practice section, Diane Rubin currently serves as REBA’s
president and is also a member of REBA Dispute Resolution’s panel of neutrals.
She has extensive experience as construction and real estate counsel to
private, public, and nonprofit clients including property developers and other
owners, notably colleges, universities, awarding authorities, and condominium
associations. Diane can be contacted at drubin@princelobel.com